Week 100: December 16-22

Trump has ordered a full withdrawal of US troops from Syria, and a withdrawal of half of our troops from Afghanistan. There was confusion on Wednesday because it was announced via tweet and all the usual stakeholders were blindsided by the decision. There was harsh and immediate disapproval from Congress, including Trump’s usual allies.

Mattis resigned in protest on Thursday. In his letter he wrote: “our strength as a nation is inextricably linked to the strength of our unique and comprehensive system of alliances and partnerships….NATO’s 29 democracies demonstrated that strength in their commitment to fighting alongside us following the 9-11 attack on America. The Defeat-ISIS coalition of 74 nations is further proof. …we must be resolute and unambiguous in our approach to those countries whose strategic interests are increasingly in tension with ours. It is clear that China and Russia, for example, want to shape a world consistent with their authoritarian model — gaining veto authority over other nations’ economic, diplomatic, and security decisions… on treating allies with respect and also being clear-eyed about both malign actors and strategic competitors… Because you have the right to have a Secretary of Defense whose views are better aligned with yours on these and other subjects, I believe it is right for me to step down from my position. “

Reports indicate he went to the White House prepared to resign but tried to persuade Trump not to withdraw from Syria and Afghanistan. When he returned to the Pentagon he distributed his letter.

Blowback from GOP members in Congress was immediate. Most telling was from McConnell: “It’s essential that the United States maintain and strengthen the post-World War II alliances that have been carefully built by leaders in both parties. We must also maintain a cleareyed understanding of our friends and foes, and recognize that nations like Russia are among the latter. So I was sorry to learn that Secretary Mattis, who shares those clear principles, will soon depart the administration. But I am particularly distressed that he is resigning due to sharp differences with the president on these and other key aspects of America’s global leadership.”

The Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue has released a rule the imposes work requirements on food stamp recipients. The farm bill that Trump signed this week dropped the very same requirement after bipartisan negotiations.

The Education and Justice Departments are planning on rescinding Obama-era rules that “advised schools on how to dole out discipline in a nondiscriminatory manner and examine education data to look for racial disparities that could flag a federal civil rights violation.” A draft of a letter from Devos’s office says “The guidance burdened local school districts, potentially exceeded the departments’ legal authority and may have made students less safe.”

An injunction earlier this week against Trump’s stricter asylum policies–that limited the reasons people could request asylum–was upheld by the Supreme Court. Roberts joined the four liberal justices.

Finally, due to an impasse over spending $5 billion on Trump’s border wall, Congress and the White House could not agree to a spending bill and the government partially shut down Friday at midnight. The Senate adjourned until December 27.

In Russia News:

On Monday, Flynn’s former business partner was charged with illegally lobbying on behalf of Turkey: “The indictment demonstrates the extent to which Flynn was secretly working to advance the interests of his Turkish clients while publicly serving as a key surrogate to Donald Trump and auditioning for a role in his administration.”

The next day there was a scene at the Flynn sentencing. The Judge castigated Flynn and his lawyers for suggesting he was duped by the FBI and made them walk that back and repeatedly made Flynn admit that he was guilty of lying. The judge said what Flynn did regarding lobbying for Turkey was “selling out our country” and that he was disgusted by it. Then he postponed sentencing until March so that Flynn could cooperate more and presumably made the judge feel better about giving him no prison time, which was the Special Counsel’s recommendation.

Senate-commissioned reports on Russian use of social media to interfere with the 2016 elections came out this week. It shows more widespread visibility of fake accounts than previously known, and that African Americans were targeted heavily.

According to the head researcher who reviewed all the social media data: “Russia was able to masquerade successfully as a collection of American media entities, managing fake personas and developing communities of hundreds of thousands, building influence over a period of years and using it to manipulate and exploit existing political and societal divisions…. It propagated lies about voting rules and processes, attempted to steer voters toward third-party candidates and created stories that advocated not voting.”

Wired compiled a summary of all 17 investigations of Trump and/or Russia. It spans seven different sets of prosecutors and investigators from Mueller to the SDNY to the NY State Attorney General, to the US Attorney of DC, to the Eastern District of Virginia.

There was big news in one of those investigations, by the New York Attorney General into Trump’s charity: “The Donald J. Trump Foundation, once billed as the charitable arm of the president’s financial empire, agreed to dissolve on Tuesday and give away all its remaining assets under court supervision as part of an ongoing investigation and lawsuit by the New York attorney general.”

Barr wrote a memo over the summer explaining why Mueller’s obstruction case is not grounded in DOJ policy or law. He sent the memo unsolicited to both DOJ and Trump’s legal team. Lawfare explains that Barr is making assumptions in this memo without actually knowing the fact pattern Mueller has. The question is if Barr will change his views when he gets access to what Mueller knows.

We also finally got word from DOJ about Whitaker’s status with the Special Counsel investigation: “A senior department official said on Thursday that Mr. Whitaker had not been receiving briefings on the special counsel investigation, but had decided on Wednesday that he would not recuse himself and would instead assume final say over major investigative or prosecutorial actions Mr. Mueller wants to take.” Whitaker did not submit himself to a formal ethics review process but instead “engaged in an informal conversation with the department’s career ethics lawyers that focused on statements like those he had made as a political commentator.” The ethics lawyers suggested he should recuse himself, but their advice is not binding and he has decided against it.

According to Just Security: “Whitaker consulted with an unspecified number of ‘senior’ DOJ ethics officials. Those officials advised him (apparently without dissent) that Whitaker should recuse himself from the Russia investigation because, in their view, ‘a reasonable person with knowledge of the relevant facts likely would question [Whitaker’s] impartiality.”

CNN reports that Trump has vented to Whitaker about his unhappiness about his legal woes, specifically about Cohen and the Souther District of New York: “Trump was frustrated, the sources said, that prosecutors Matt Whitaker oversees filed charges that made Trump look bad. None of the sources suggested that the President directed Whitaker to stop the investigation, but rather lashed out at what he felt was an unfair situation…. Trump pressed Whitaker on why more wasn’t being done to control prosecutors in New York who brought the charges in the first place, suggesting they were going rogue.”

Trump’s Job Approval: 42.4%

Week 99: December 9-15

Nick Ayers, Pence’s chief of staff whom Trump had tapped to replace Kelly as his own chief of staff, has turned down the offer and announced he is leaving the administration entirely by the end of the year.

On Friday Chris Christie turned down Trump’s offer to be his chief of staff. According to the Washington Post: “A person close to Christie said a number of current and former White House aides warned Christie that the building was unmanageable and that ‘no one can have success there.'” Mulveney was given the job on what appears to be an interim basis. 

Pelosi, Schumer, Trump and Pence met in the Oval Office to discuss the upcoming budget showdown and Trump’s demand for wall spending. Trump invited cameras into the room, and the ensuing argument was broadcast live. Trump said he would be happy to shut the government down over border security.

Michael Isikoff reports that Barr was tapped to be Trump’s defense laywer at least twice before Trump nominated him to Attorney General. The article also details negative comments about Mueller Barr has made in the last year.

Federal prosecutors have opened an investigation to see if the Trump inaugural committee misspent donor funds by pumping money into the Trump Organization or other kids of graft, and also whether foreign countries mostly in the Middle East made illegal donations to the committee. According to ProPublica, Ivanka is implicated: “A top inaugural planner emailed Ivanka and others at the company to ‘express my concern’ that the hotel was overcharging for its event spaces, worrying of what would happen ‘when this is audited.'” $40 million is unaccounted for.

The Texas judge finally released his Obamacare decision. He struck down the entire law. This does not go into effect until it is upheld by higher courts. 

Ryan Zinke resigned from as Interior Secretary.  

In Hush Money News: 

On Wednesday, Cohen was sentenced to three years in jail for “tax evasion, false bank statements, campaign-finance violations, and lying to Congress.”

David Pecker and AMI admitted to making the $150,000 payment to McDougal to cover up her affair with Trump. They have made a deal with federal investigators to provide information about the case, and will not be charged with any crimes.

In Russia News:

In preparation for Flynn’s sentencing next week, his lawyers released a letter suggesting he was tricked into lying to the FBI. This caused Mueller’s team to send a partially redacted rebuttal to the judge. According to the New York Times: “prosecutors explained his confidence … as a result of the numerous dishonest accounts he had already given about his conversations with Mr. Kislyak. ‘By the time of the F.B.I. interview,’ they wrote, ‘the defendant was committed to his false story.’”  

In Immigration News: 

Ice arrested 170 undocumented immigrants who came forward to sponsor or claim migrant children being held in custody. 109 had no criminal record. Nearly 80% of the people who came forward to sponsor children were not in the country legally.


Trump’s Job Approval: 42.5% 

Week 98: December 2-8

In Russia News:

Some Trump tweets Monday morning praised Stone for not cooperating, and that Cohen was a liar who should be sentenced to maximum time. George Conway tweeted a suggestion that this might be witness tampering. Experts say it’s close but may not be provable in court.

Here is an Lawfare explainer of the witness tampering law and how it may or may not apply in this case.

In an addendum to Flynn’s sentencing memo, Mueller’s team writes that Flynn sat for 19 interviews, assisting three separate criminal investigations, only one of which is the Russian collusion investigation, and that some of the benefit Flynn has provided “may not be fully realized at this time because the investigations in which he has provided assistance are ongoing.” Muller is recommending no jail time.

There are still questions about whether or not Whitaker has recused himself from the Mueller investigation, and whether or not he has seen the redacted information (among other documents) in the Flynn sentencing memo. So far DOJ is not commenting when asked.

Court documents about Cohen and Manafort were released late Friday afternoon from SDNY and Muller. The Manafort sentencing memo came from Muller and accused Manafort of lying about being in contact with Kilimnick, about being in contact with senior administration officials as late as February 2018, and other matters. He also lied about a $125,000 payment to a firm, and this section was heavily redacted. Here is the Manafort document.

The SDNY issued a 40 page non-redacted sentencing memo that recommended the judge “impose a substantial term of imprisonment.” Cohen admitted to discussing with Trump “contacting the Kremlin in the fall of 2015, months after the beginning of his presidential bid, to organize a meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin at the U.N. General Assembly in September 2015.” Also, the government accused Cohen of crimes in paying hush money to Daniels and McDougal: “Cohen’s commission of two campaign finance crimes on the eve of the 2016 election for President of the United States struck a blow to one of the core goals of the federal campaign finance laws: transparency. While many Americans who desired a particular outcome to the election knocked on doors, toiled at phone banks, or found any number of other legal ways to make their voices heard, Cohen sought to influence the election from the shadows. He did so by orchestrating secret and illegal payments to silence two women who otherwise would have made public their alleged extramarital affairs… Cohen deceived the voting public by hiding alleged facts that he believed would have had a substantial effect on the Election.”

The SDNY also said Trump directed Cohen to commit these crimes: “With respect to both payments, Cohen acted with the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election. Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1.”

From Lawfare: “this is the first time that the government has alleged in its own voice that President Trump is personally involved in what it considers to be federal offenses.”

Mueller for the first time is publicly connecting the Trump Tower Moscow deal with the election collusion investigation: According to Buzfeed news: “The activity surrounding the Trump Tower Moscow project is ‘particularly’ relevant, Mueller said, because it happened in the time when ‘sustained efforts by the Russian government to interfere’ in the election were taking place.” A Russian athlete named Dmitry Klokov reached out to Cohen in the November 2015 about the Moscow Project, offering to connect Trump and Putin and promising “political synergy.” He told Cohen that “such a meeting could have a ‘phenomenal’ impact ‘not only in political but in a business dimension as well.'”

Reactions: 

At 6:00pm Trump tweeted: “Totally clears the President. Thank you!”

David French’s first impression Friday night was to make comparisons to Nixon and Clinton articles of impeachment about encouraging and helping others to lie: “it is highly likely that senior Trump officials reviewed Cohen’s prepared, false testimony before he lied to Congress. This raises two important questions. Was Trump aware of the substance of Cohen’s testimony? If so, was Trump aware that Cohen’s testimony was false?… Nothing is yet set in stone, but tonight was a very bad night for his presidency. Donald Trump’s legal problems continue to mount.”

Ken White (PopeHat on Twitter) writes: “If the Southern District’s fury at Cohen is notable, its explicit accusation that President Trump directed and coordinated campaign-finance violations is simply stunning. The prosecutors’ openness suggests that they are sure of their evidence and have mostly finished collecting it. It’s a sign of a fully developed, late-game investigation of the president’s role, one that may soon make its way to Congress.” Also: “That statement suggests that the special counsel believes that someone in the Trump administration knew of, and approved in advance, Cohen’s lies to Congress. That’s explosive, and potentially impeachable if Trump himself is implicated.”

Andrew McCarthy goes into detail about the campaign finance violations Cohen is charged with, and predicts that SDNY will indict Trump: “According to prosecutors, Pecker arranged with Cohen that the Enquirer would buy McDougal’s story for $150,000 and bury it. Although it was contemplated that Cohen would reimburse Pecker (and then be reimbursed by Trump), the reimbursement did not happen. Cohen, therefore, pleaded guilty not to making his own excessive contribution but to causing a third party to make an illegal contribution. Cohen says he was operating at Trump’s direction. Logically, then, if this is true and Cohen caused the third-party illegal contribution, so did the president. Notably: prosecutors have given Pecker and another American Media executive, Dylan Howard, immunity from prosecution. Do you think prosecutors did that to tighten up the case against Cohen? I don’t.”

In other news:

The funeral of George H.W. Bush was held in the national cathedral on Wednesday. Trump and Melania attended, and sat with all the previous presidents and first ladies in one pew. It was the first time Trump was with all the living presidents.

A US district judge has said an emoluments case against Trump can proceed so long as discovery is limited to the Trump hotel is DC. Maryland and DC now have 13 subpoenas for records that may show Trump has received emoluments from foreign countries through the hotel.

The Washington Post reports that the Saudi’s used veteran groups to send veterans to DC to lobby Congress and put them up in Trump Hotel. They booked blocks of rooms for 500 nights. One veteran initially “believed the trips were organized by other veterans, but that puzzled him, because this group spent money like no veterans group he had ever worked with. There were private hotel rooms, open bars, free dinners. Then, Garcia said, one of the organizers who had been drinking minibar champagne mentioned a Saudi prince. ‘I said, Oh, we were just used to give Trump money,’ Garcia said.”

Haspel gave a classified briefing to senators Tuesday that convinced them the crown prince was directly responsible for the Khasoggi murder: “The intelligence agency is also believed to have evidence that the crown prince communicated repeatedly with an aide who commanded the team that assassinated Mr. Khashoggi, around the time of the journalist’s death on Oct. 2.” Senators suggest Matis and Pompeo are being misleading by sugesting that there is not “smoking gun” evidence of the prince’s guilt.

Friday morning, Trump announced he was downgrading the UN ambassador to a sub-cabinet position, and appointed former Fox News anchor Heather Nauert to the role. He appointed William Barr to be his next Attorney General; he previously held the job for H.W. Bush. And Trump announced Kelly will leave the White House by the end of the year. 

Trump’s Job Approval Rating: 42.2% 

Discovery Theme Series | Theme 3: Might vs. Right & Fate vs. Agency

Theme 3: Might vs. Right & Fate vs. Agency

Might does not make right, and belief that you are a Chosen One blinds you to the agency of others, or even your own.  

Star Trek: Discovery (DSC) is rife with commentary on the nature of political power and who gets to wield it. There is also a lot of talk about fate, with Lorca’s fortune cookies as a recurring symbol. What is going on here? Let’s see if we can pull these two threads together.

Lorca exemplifies the type of person who wields raw power with intentional lack of regard and compassion for others. The etymology of his first name, Gabriel, means ‘strong man.’ Jason Isaacs describes his character this way in a Buzzfeed interview: “[Lorca’s] a liar and a manipulator, and obviously thinks that might is right, and he thinks that he can get anyone to do what he wants.”

This is no mere commentary on Terran Empire political philosophy. It is inspired by current events. Isaacs collaborated with the writers to create a character that represents the nationalist/populist strongmen who are gaining followers and political power all around the world, including the United States. In an interview on the Season 1 Blu-ray Isaacs explains their motivation:  

There are many people who are out there who can passionately argue that the notion … people can work together, that there are harmonious solutions, diplomatic solutions to things, is fanciful and may be short lived. And we see a resurgence in politics around the world right now that one needs to be strong and one needs to dominate militarily, and that bullying is the right way to go, that this blip in human relations for the last 50 to 100 years has been just that, and we will return to might is right.

For Isaacs, putting this message out into the world was “one of the reasons to make the show.” Explaining that Star Trek has always been a socially conscious entertainment property, he says, “the only reason to do it again was to tell a story that has some modern resonance. It’s such a horribly, unbelievably decisive time.”

Some fans think that Lorca’s imitation of Trump was too on the nose–“Terrans need a leader who will preserve our way of life, our race … make the Empire glorious again.”–but Loca is a timeless archetype, which like it or not has also become a timely one. The character will feel relevant long after Trump is off the stage.   

The question of whether might makes right will never be a universally agreed upon proposition, human nature being what it is. But there are periods in history that cause the question to be asked–and answered–more loudly than in other periods. Just speaking of Isaacs’s British tradition, the principle that right makes might is one of the reasons King Arthur became a beloved English folk hero; his benevolent and ur-democratic tendencies were a welcome fantasy to a people living under a spate of more bad kings than good ones. Robin Hood was another example of right making might. He was popularized under a king who was forced to sign the Magna Carta, which finally enshrined into law the notion that what is right is dependent not upon the king’s guards but on a universal sense of fairness and dignity. These ideas reached their logical conclusion with the United States Constitution. And yet… we are now in a period where storytellers are again called upon to pose the question: should might make right; is that who we really want to be?  

As David Frum wrote recently about his debate with former Trump advisor Steve Bannon: “The cruel always believe the kind are weak. But human decency and goodness can also move human affairs. They will be felt. And today’s ‘populists’ will follow their predecessors into what President George W. Bush so aptly called ‘history’s graveyard of discarded lies.’”

These words, and many like them spilled across our newspapers, sound much like lines of dialogue in Season 1 of Star Trek: Discovery. As the current political moment evolves (for good or ill) and we look back on Season 1, its “modern resonance” will only become more clear. We will look back–as we do on many episodes of TOS–and be grateful that Star Trek once again took a stand when it mattered. By killing off Lorca–the quintessential “bad king”–and allowing the Discovery crew to triumph, the show reminds us that might does not make right, and that “human decency and goodness can also move human affairs.”

But what about those fortune cookies?

People who put themselves on the might side of the Right-vs-Might equation tend to create all sorts of justifications for their power. They craft a narrative that explains why they got to the top of their society’s food chain when so many others did not. For those kings of England the story they told themselves and their people was that God literally handpicked them and their family to rule in His name. In the modern world, people who wield socio-economic power–say a business owner of a profitable fortune cookie company, like Lorca’s ancestor–tell themselves that they just worked harder and smarter than other people. While this may often be true, this narrative edits out certain privileges that may have been available to them and not others. It is seductive to hold the self image that you are special, unique, and chosen. It can also create negative consequences not just for those around you but also yourself.   

Lorca does not believe in God, but he does believe in an unseen, all-powerful force in the universe that continues to smile on him alone. Describing the ion storm that sent him to the prime universe, he says “It was physics working as the hand of destiny, my destiny.” When he is about to declare himself the new emperor, reflecting back on all the twists in his life that brought him to this moment, he declares, “Nothing that’s happened to me was an accident…. I’m living proof that fate is real.”

Isaacs says of Lorca: “He’s also a racial purist… everybody has a place, and there’s a natural hierarchy that needs to be respected.” If fate has decreed that he should be on top, that must mean that fate also wants everyone else at the bottom.  

The show does not endorse this view, of course. In fact, holding this view makes Lorca not only unsuccessful at his goals, but foolishly so. By believing he is destined to be emperor with Burnham at his side, and that it would be impossible for these things not to happen to him, he fails to foresee how Burnham will betray him. He does not see Georgiou’s blade until it’s sticking out of his chest.    

Burnham knows better. Earlier in the season, when Lorca muses about how fate brought them together, she corrects him: “Fate did not bring me here. You did.” When you are powerless in society, as she was when Lorca found her, you see things about how the power structures of society impact your life that people in power may not see, or don’t want to see. Burnham knows from experience that she is a cork bobbing in the ocean subject to powerful currents she cannot control. But she is not fatalistic about this. She knows that she has at least some agency, which with great effort, cunning and bravery, she can use to at least keep herself afloat in those currents and to steer in the direction she wants to go. 

The fact that Burnham is played by a woman and a person of color adds more of that “modern resonance” to this theme. People who look like Sonequa Martin-Green have no illusions about how on point they must be in order to get ahead in life, while some (many?) people who look like Jason Isaacs go through life without ever being fully aware of the large and small graces they have received that allowed them to get as far as they did.    

In an article about how DSC “was actually feminist all along” Casey Cipriani writes: “Lorca’s actions are decidedly misogynistic from the beginning. He essentially kidnapped Burnham from her prison transport because he was in a type of creepy, grooming, father-figure-turned-romantic sexual relationship with the Burnham from his universe. That he felt that he could simply take ownership of the Prime universe’s Burnham, groom her as well, and convince her to join his cause is a level of presumptuousness that only comes with extreme disregard for women’s own agency.”   

Despite this, Burnham’s craftiness and skill won the day over his blind self regard for his own power. If Lorca saw life as she did, and knew that you have to make your own fate, he might have been more careful and avoided dying in a mycelial fireball.  

In the end, the bowl of fortune cookies–the symbol of Lorca’s belief in fate, which allowed him to believe his might was always right–was vaporized by Cornwall’s phaser. Then the crew sat together around the conference table, and instead of waiting for some invisible force to guide them, they set about solving their problems on their own.

Week 97: November 25-December 1

As the week began, there was reporting about a “remain in Mexico” policy for asylum seekers being negotiated with Mexico. But the Trump Administration has not yet secured a formal agreement, and Mexico released a non-denial denial that the policy was in the works.

In Tijuana, Mexico is holding about 5,000 migrants, some from the caravan, in a tent city. On Sunday they rushed the border–some migrants said they were marching to the boarder to negotiate with US border agents. Mexican riot police pushed them back, and US agents fired tear gas canisters.

On Sunday Russian fighter jets fired on Ukrainian naval vessels.

Reporting this week tells us that the Trump Administration was too afraid of the political and legal blowback of suppressing or altering last week’s federal climate change report. Instead they released it on Black Friday to minimize public awareness. And they were not overly concerned with public awareness to begin with: “We don’t care. In our view, this is made-up hysteria anyway,” Said Steven J Milloy, a member of Trump’s EPA transition team.

Bolton said he has not listened to the audio of the Khashoggi murder.

Trump attended the G-20 Summit. He canceled his meeting with Putin. People speculate that he did so because of the Cohen plea deal and not for the stated reasons of Putin’s recent Ukraine aggression. At the G-20 Trump tried to declare a pause in the tariff war with China, and signed the new NAFTA deal, although Congress is suggesting they will not vote it into law.

FinallyGeorge H.W. Bush died on Saturday.

In Russia News:

On Monday the Mueller team said that Manafort has lied repeatedly during his plea agreement, thus violating any obligations of leniency, and that he should be sentenced immediately.

The New York Times reports that Manfort’s lawyers shared information with Trump’s lawyers after Manafort agreed to cooperate with Mueller: “Some legal experts speculated that it was a bid by Mr. Manafort for a presidential pardon even as he worked with the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, in hopes of a lighter sentence.” And this: “Though it was unclear how frequently [Kevin Downing ] spoke to Mr. Trump’s lawyers or how much he revealed, his updates helped reassure Mr. Trump’s legal team that Mr. Manafort had not implicated the president in any possible wrongdoing.” If this is true, it is very irregular, and likely means Manafort’s lawyers will have a hard time finding clients in the future because no one will trust their ability to negotiate a plea agreement. 

Here is a good explainer of the implications of this: “It’s a blow to Mr. Mueller’s team, because their questions to Mr. Manafort — repeated to Mr. Trump’s lawyers — may be a road map to at least part of the special counsel investigation. … It’s a blow to Mr. Manafort, who will receive no sentencing credit for his brief cooperation. It’s a blow to Mr. Manafort’s lawyers; no federal prosecutor will ever trust them again. And it’s a blow to Mr. Trump, who has overplayed his hand, because Mr. Mueller may now be able to delve into the Trump lawyers’ conversations with Mr. Manafort’s lawyers.
They are consistent with only one conclusion: Mr. Manafort and his lawyers seek a presidential pardon, not a reduced sentence through sincere cooperation.”

NBC and CNN obtained documents from court filings about Jerome Corsi. There are emails between Corsi and Stone about the Wikileaks dumps of Clinton emails two months before those dumps began: “Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps,” Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. “One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging.” There was some talk even in conservative press about the fact that the Corsi/Assange/Stone nexus started the idea of talking about Clinton’s poor health, backed up by Wikileaks documents, and then Trump then started pushing that message on the stump.  

In a surprise legal move, Cohen plead guilty to lies that Mueller accused him of on Thursday morning. He admitted to lying to Congress about pursuing the Trump Tower Moscow deal during the 2016 election with Kremlin agents (first reported in Buzzfeed in May 2018). He also admitted to lying about the fact that the Russians actually responded to him (when this aspect was earlier reported, there was media snark about how Cohen used a generic Russian government email he found on the internet, and that no one replied–the fact that Putin’s press secretary called Cohen back was not in the Buzzfeed article). He also admitted to lying about how much conversation there was in the Trump organization and campaign about Cohen and Trump traveling to Russia to discuss the deal.

Lawfare wants us to pause on the Cohen revelations and consider that “this is all utterly unacceptable. That a large swath of the public, and the legislative branch, has chosen to accept it does not make it more reasonable that a man seeking to be president of the United States would at the same time publicly cozy up to a foreign dictator and negotiate with his regime over a potential business opportunity—and then cover it all up.” But they also point out that “contemplating a significant real estate deal in the capital of a hostile foreign power, that in and of itself does not constitute criminal behavior.” 

Also from Lawfare: “notwithstanding the omission of those few key details, the court documents released Thursday continue Mueller’s trend of using ‘speaking indictments.’ Although the document here is a criminal information, rather than an indictment, the filing is factually rich and tells a story in a fashion that seems designed to inform the public.”

This quote is the strongest condemnation Andrew McCarthy has bout the Cohen revelation: “Now, such a showing of collusion could be politically damaging. It might even be something on which the Democratic-controlled House could try to build an impeachment effort. But it is not a criminal conspiracy because it does not establish an agreement to commit a federal crime.” He is still arguing that Mueller will not find any actual crime on Trump’s part, and seems to be of a mind with Allan Dershowitz who says this week that Meuller is now “looking for political sin.”

On Friday morning Trump tweeted “Oh, I get it! I am a very good developer, happily living my life, when I see our Country going in the wrong direction (to put it mildly). Against all odds, I decide to run for President & continue to run my business-very legal & very cool, talked about it on the campaign trail….Lightly looked at doing a building somewhere in Russia. Put up zero money, zero guarantees and didn’t do the project. Witch Hunt!”

Later Friday morning a judge set a sentencing date for Manafort as March 5. Also the judge will “first be tasked with deciding whether Manafort did, in fact, breach his plea agreement with Mueller’s office. The government is due to submit papers about that allegation by Dec. 7, and Manafort’s lawyers will then propose a schedule for responding.” (Cohen’s sentencing is December 12, and Flynns is December 18.)

In Cohen’s sentencing memo his lawyers make the case to the judge for leniency. It makes the following point: “In the context of this raw, full-bore attack by the most powerful person in the United States, Michael, formerly a confidante and adviser to Mr. Trump, resolved to cooperate, and voluntarily
took the first steps toward doing so even before he was charged in this District.” It also makes a point of saying Cohen is fully cooperating “despite regular public reports referring to the President’s consideration of pardons and pre-pardons in the SCO’s investigation.”

While all of this is going on, there is no word about Whitaker’s role or whether he has recused himself yet. But on Friday The Washington Post reported that Whitaker was notified about the Cohen guilty plea beforehand.

The same Buzzfeed reporters who broke the Moscow Project story back in May report this week that Trump offered to gift Putin a $50 million penthouse in the top of the tower.

Trump’s Job Approval: 42.4%

Discovery Theme Series | Theme 2: Perception vs. Identity (Nature vs. Nurture)

Theme 2: Perception vs. Identity (Nature vs Nurture)

Our perception of others shapes their identity for good or ill.

Shortly before Ripper rips apart Landry, Burnham tries to talk her out of seeing the Tardigrade as a hostile force that can be converted into a weapon: “You judge the creature by its appearance, and one single incident from its past. Nothing in its biology suggests it would attack, except in self-defense. Commander, this creature is an unknown alien. It can only be what it is, not what you want it to be.”

This question of how we see other people, and the consequences of that perspective on ourselves as well as the individual, is one that recurs throughout the season. The message takes the xenophobia theme of the season (see Theme 1) and applies it to a person-to-person context. It is relatively easy to not be racist against a whole group, but it can be harder to keep from projecting your preconceived notions and prejudices onto an individual in your space.

The writers pushed this theme one step further by showing how our perception of an individual can actually begin to shape their identity. Burnham is suggesting that the greater danger facing Ripper is not that it would be killed, but that it would become the killing machine Landry and Lorca wanted it to be, that its will would be broken and its nature permanently warped.

Later in the season, Tilly makes this point explicit when trying to convince Burnham to forgive Tyler:

When we were in the Terran universe I was reminded how much a person is shaped by their environment. And the only way to stop ourselves from becoming them is to understand the darkness within us and fight it. … [Tyler/Voq’s] crimes are reprehensible but Tyler is not the person who did that, at least not anymore. Tyler is something other, someone new. What we do now, the way that we treat him, that is who he will become. 

In other words, if we treat someone like a monster or a freak, they will soon begin to see themselves that way, and their behavior will change accordingly. Tilly is the one character on DSC who seems to be instinctually predisposed to this view of people. She is instrumental in freeing Ripper, and in rallying her crewmates to welcome Tyler back into the family. She also makes a similar speech to Saru about Stamets when it was believed Stamets killed Culber under the influence of the spores. Burnham has a harder time practicing this level of empathy when it comes to Tyler. When she rejects him, she says it is because when she looks into his eyes she sees Voq. She judges him based on “one single incident from his past,” albeit understandably since in that moment Voq tried to kill her. It is only after she observes him on Kronos interacting normally with other Klingons, and after he decides to stay with L’Rell, that she can tell Tyler she sees him for who he actually is.

Tyler’s reason for staying on Kronos is also an expression of this theme. He knows that Starfleet would treat him as a science experiment, a medical marvel or a freakshow. Despite Tilly’s best efforts, the one Starfleet officer he cares about has not only dumped him but denied the validity of his core identity. When he is in the Orion settlement, laughing and playing games with other Klingons, being accepted by them for who he is–a Human who can speak Klingon like “a dog who can waterski”–he begins to see himself as they see him. Because Tyler is clearly Human and knows things only Klingons would know (thanks to Voq’s memories) the other Klingons treat Tyler as the Klingon-Human hybrid that he is beginning to accept himself to be. Their acceptance helps him become himself. Tyler’s character arc was a mystery (some might argue a confusing mess) until the last episode of the season, when his identity finally became clear and compelling. Hopefully this character arc will be developed in Season 2.        

The perception theme is explored from a different angle in the relationship between Sarek and Burnham. She wants him to see her as his daughter, and he withholds that at first. In Lethe they have this exchange:   

Burnham: “Help me understand what you did. It could make us grow closer, not further apart. That’s what families do.”

Sarek: “Technically, we are not related.”

Burnham: “You can do better. But I won’t push you. We’ll have this conversation one day. Father.”

This is the first time that their relationship is described in such tight, familial terms. Sarek had described Burnham as “my ward,” and the fan community debated if she was legally adopted, fostered, or some other arrangement. There was a sense of cold, professional distance between them up to that point, one that Sarek was trying to maintain in that moment. By the end of the season, Sarek has a change of heart. He tells Burnham, “You are only human, as is your mother.” He means Amanda, and by extension if Amanda is his mother then he is Burnham’s father. This line was written as a counterpoint to the scene from Lethe, and it packs a punch. When I first heard the line I was disoriented because I assumed Sarek meant Burnham’s biological mother, who was killed. But then I realized if that is who he meant, he would have said “as were your parents.” By just mentioning Amanda, he is is acknowledging that both he and Amanda are Burnham’s parents. He does not say the word father, which she leveled almost as an accusation at the end of Lethe, but by pointedly not saying it he lays a heavy inference on the word. Logically, there is no way he believes Amanda is Burnham’s mother without also believing he is Burnham’s father.

Burnham longed to be viewed as Sarek’s daughter. As an orphan, it caused her pain that she was not a daughter to anyone. She was able to convince Sarek to look in her eyes and see not a ward but family, and thus some of that pain was taken away.

There are other examples of the power of perception, and how it can get you into trouble.

  • Burnham perceived the Klingon ship at the Binary Stars as an imminent threat, based in part on her childhood trauma and her projection of the Vulcan experience onto the current situation. T’Kuvma went to the Binary Stars, and shot up that Starfleet satellite, precisely because he was counting on Starfleet officers to perceive him the way Burnham did and start the war that he wanted. Captain Georgiou, on the other hand, chose on principle to give the Klingons the benefit of the doubt. To do so meant a localized risk to her crew, but provided the best chance of avoiding a wider war.
  • L’Rell and Cornwall were enemies but they succeeded in seeing one another as individuals. Cornwall tells her, “I do not subscribe to your ideals, but I feel as though you and I understand one another.” And L’Rell reciprocates, “T’Kuvma said Humans have no courage, on this he was wrong.” By not allowing their strong feelings about the war to keep them from engaging with one another as people, their relationship paved the way to ending the war.
  • Burnham fails to clearly see Emperor Georgiou through of the memories of her former captain; only after she starts masquerading of Captain Georgiou does she admit that she sees her for the evil person she really is. We will see if Georgiou loses those evil ways after living in the Federation, and being perceived as the good-hearted captain. Or will Section 31 foster her Terran dark worldview? This is another story arc that may develop in Season 2.    
  • The symbolism of the Terran eye sensitivity, which literally keeps them in the dark and in a perpetual state of staring out through the darkness. Is that the reason the Terran species branched off on such a different historical path than their Human counterparts?    

In all these examples, DCS is telling us that nurture matters so much more than nature in shaping a person’s identity. And that we all have the power to nurture others in a positive way by letting go of our preconceived notions about them and seeing them with generosity of spirit.